[A 3:15 minute video hosted on YouTube. English subtitles can be turned on if required]
<<Previous in series: What influences how policy practice is enacted? (Part 3)
This is the sixth video in a series providing an understanding of local level policy practice and its development.
I hope that you find it provides a helpful way of thinking about the ways in which the co-existing practices directly and indirectly influence policy practice performance.
I look forward to our discussions.
References and further reading
The video itself is reference free, but I would like to acknowledge that I have used ideas from the following sources as well as my own research. I would recommend the texts as further reading too.
The framework of practice performance that I developed is predominantly based on the Theory of Practice architectures. It was first articulated in 2008 and has evolved since. Key sources (in chronological order) are:
- Kemmis, S. and Grootenboer, P. (2008) ‘Situating praxis in practice’, in Kemmis, S. and Smith, T. J. (eds) Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. 37–62.
-
Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Wilkinson, J. and Hardy, I. (2012) ‘Ecologies of practices’, in Hager, P., Lee, A., and Reich, A. (eds) Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 33–49.
-
Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P. and Bristol, L. (2014) ‘Praxis, practice and practice architectures’, in Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer, pp. 25–43.Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. and Nixon, R. (2014) The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer Link.
-
Mahon, K., Francisco, S. and Kemmis, S. (eds) (2017) Exploring education and professional practice. Singapore: Springer.
Discussions of different types of capacity required in government and the tensions between them:
- Copus, C., Roberts, M. and Wall, R. (2017) Local government in England: Centralisation, autonomy and control. Google Play sample. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Gleeson, D., Legge, D., O’Neill, D. and Pfeffer, M. (2011) ‘Negotiating tensions in developing organizational policy capacity: Comparative lessons to be drawn’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(3), pp. 237–263. doi: 10.1080/13876988.2011.565912.
>>Next in series: What influences how policy practice is enacted? (Part 5)
Local policy practice by Helen Wilding is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike