What influences how policy practice is enacted? (Part 2)


[A 5:47 minute video hosted on YouTube. English subtitles can be turned on if required]

<<Previous in series: What influences how policy practice is enacted? (Part 1)

This is the fourth video in a series providing an understanding of local level policy practice and its development.

I hope that you find it provides a helpful way of thinking about the policy capacity which is a key proximal influence on policy practice performance.

I look forward to our discussions.

References and further reading

The video itself is reference free, but I would like to acknowledge that I have used ideas from the following sources as well as my own research.  I would recommend the texts as further reading too.

The framework of practice performance that I developed is predominantly based on the Theory of Practice architectures.  It was first articulated in 2008 and has evolved since.  Key sources (in chronological order) are:

  • Kemmis, S. and Grootenboer, P. (2008) ‘Situating praxis in practice’, in Kemmis, S. and Smith, T. J. (eds) Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp. 37–62.
  • Kemmis, S., Edwards-Groves, C., Wilkinson, J. and Hardy, I. (2012) ‘Ecologies of practices’, in Hager, P., Lee, A., and Reich, A. (eds) Practice, learning and change: Practice-theory perspectives on professional learning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, pp. 33–49.
  • Kemmis, S., Wilkinson, J., Edwards-Groves, C., Hardy, I., Grootenboer, P. and Bristol, L. (2014) ‘Praxis, practice and practice architectures’, in Changing practices, changing education. Singapore: Springer, pp. 25–43.
    Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. and Nixon, R. (2014) The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer Link.
  • Mahon, K., Francisco, S. and Kemmis, S. (eds) (2017) Exploring education and professional practice. Singapore: Springer.

Authors that have made distinctions between policy practitioners who are content specialists and those who are process generalists:

  • Putland, A. D. (2013) The respective roles of technical and generalist policy specialists in the policy process. PhD Thesis. Southern Cross University. Available at: https://epubs.scu.edu.au/theses/301/ (Accessed: 26 February 2020).
  • Page, E. C. and Jenkins, B. (2005) Policy bureaucracy: Government with a cast of thousands. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Policy capacity is a key concept used in the study of public policy.  I use the term here in a way that is consistent with the way practitioners in my primary research talk about it.  For more on how it is used in scholarly literature, please see:
  • Wu, X., Ramesh, M. and Howlett, M. (2017) ‘Policy capacity: Conceptual framework and essential components’, in Wu, X., Howlett, M., and Ramesh, M. (eds) Policy capacity and governance. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–25.

>>Next in series: What influences how policy practice is enacted? (Part 3)

 

When you share your thoughts….

Please remain respectful of all other users at all times. Do not post offensive posts, images or links. The information is in the public domain so please give thought to how much information you disclose about yourself, others, or your place of work.

Share your thoughts here...

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.